Advantages and Disadvantages of Pusher-Type Propellers Planes

Most propeller planes typically have their propellers facing the front, which is the most common design, even in commercial planes. This configuration is known as “pull-propellers.” They are usually mounted in front of an engine, whether the engine is on the wing or in the fuselage. However, you might have seen some planes with propellers facing the rear, such as the Piaggio Avanti, Convair B-36, and even the Wright Flyer. These aircraft have their propellers mounted facing the rear and are known as “pusher-type propellers” or push-configuration.

In pusher-type propellers, the air or thrust generated from the rear-facing propellers pushes the aircraft forward. In contrast, propellers facing the front, also known as “tractor configuration,” pull the aircraft forward. While pusher-type propellers were used on some of the earliest aircraft, including airships, they are not as popular today. What advantages and disadvantages do they offer?

Advantages of Pusher-Type Propellers

• One of the primary advantages of pusher-type propellers is the reduced stress on the drive shaft. In a pusher engine, the drive shaft is in compression during normal operation, which is less strenuous than the tension experienced in a tractor configuration. This aspect contributes to the durability and longevity of the pusher configuration.
• Visibility and practicality are also enhanced in pusher-type aircraft. By placing the cockpit ahead of the wings, pilots enjoy improved visibility, a crucial factor for safe flying. This layout also balances the aircraft by offsetting the weight of the rear-mounted engines. In military applications, this configuration allows for easier use of front armament since there’s no need to synchronize the gun with the propeller.
• Pusher configurations are popular in ultralight aircraft, UAVs, and radio-controlled airplanes. The engine’s position behind the pilot in aircraft like paramotors and flexwing trikes minimizes the risk of injury to the pilot’s limbs.
• Aerodynamically, pusher aircraft can have shorter fuselages, leading to reduced weight and less fuselage wetted area. The propeller’s position at the fuselage end contributes to stability, requiring less vertical tail area and presenting less sensitivity to crosswinds during takeoff.
• Interestingly, mounting a propeller behind the fuselage can re-energize the boundary layer on the body, reducing form drag and improving efficiency. However, this gain is often minor compared to the overall impact on propeller efficiency.
• In terms of safety, the pusher configuration has some notable advantages. The engine’s position behind the crew compartment means that in the event of a fuel oil or coolant leak, or even an engine fire, these hazards are directed away from the passengers.

Challenges and Disadvantages

Despite its advantages, the pusher configuration is not without its challenges. Structurally, a pusher design is more complex than its tractor counterpart. The added complexity can lead to increased weight and drag, potentially impacting performance.

• Center of gravity and landing gear considerations are critical in pusher aircraft. The engine’s aft position limits how far it can be installed to maintain a safe center of gravity. This factor, along with the high thrust line for propeller clearance, can necessitate a higher takeoff speed and longer roll compared to tractor aircraft.
• Aerodynamically, pusher configurations can suffer from power change-induced pitch changes, especially in low-wing layouts. This issue can affect control at low speeds and increase the takeoff roll length.
• Propeller ground clearance and the risk of foreign object damage are heightened in pusher aircraft. The proximity of the propeller to the ground during takeoff and landing increases the likelihood of blade damage or wear.
• Propeller efficiency and noise are also concerns. The propeller operating in the wake of the fuselage and other surfaces can lead to reduced efficiency and increased noise. This inefficiency is often more pronounced than in tractor configurations.
• Engine cooling and exhaust management are more complex in pusher engines. The absence of direct airflow over the engine necessitates additional cooling solutions, adding weight and complexity.

Despite these challenges, pusher propellers are used in certain aircraft designs where specific advantages, like a clearer field of view for pilots in reconnaissance aircraft or specific aerodynamic qualities, are desired. However, for general aviation and commercial purposes, the puller configuration tends to be more efficient and practical.