The long-standing discussion over which is the superior aircraft, the Airbus A320neo or the Boeing 737 MAX, has intrigued aviation enthusiasts for years. From my perspective, I lean towards the ‘Bus,’ given its impressive specifications, advanced technologies, and evolutionary progression. However, it’s crucial to note that the ultimate winner is the aircraft that best aligns with an airline’s unique requirements. Therefore, even though I advocate for the A320neo, airlines like Southwest might hold a contrasting view, finding the 737 MAX more suited to their specific needs. So, how do we determine which among the Airbus A320neo and the Boeing 737 MAX truly excels? Well, I leave that judgment up to you, but allow me to lay out some essential facts and points for your consideration.
Two Icons Born from Necessity
In the world of aviation, two giants have consistently dominated the skies: Airbus and Boeing. Among their impressive line of aircraft, the Airbus A320neo and Boeing 737 MAX particularly stand out. This article aims to provide a comprehensive comparison of the A320neo and 737 MAX, examining their history, technology, efficiency, and safety records.
Since its inception, the Airbus A320 family has earned a place in aviation history. Launched in 1984, the original A320 set the bar for single-aisle aircraft. Fast forward to December 2010, Airbus announced the birth of the A320neo (New Engine Option), featuring cutting-edge technology and superior fuel efficiency.
On the other hand, the 737 MAX stems from Boeing’s 737 family, the best-selling commercial jetliner series in history. To compete with the A320neo’s efficiency, Boeing announced the 737 MAX in August 2011. It promised improved fuel efficiency, aerodynamic enhancements, and advanced onboard technology.
Technological Advances
Both the A320neo and 737 MAX embody advanced technology. The A320neo features state-of-the-art aerodynamics, extensive weight savings, and new generation engines – the Pratt & Whitney PW1100G or CFM International LEAP-1A. These engines offer reduced noise and CO2 emissions, making the A320neo an environmentally friendly option.
Similarly, the 737 MAX comes with advanced LEAP-1B engines and split-tip winglets, improving fuel efficiency by up to 14%. Its spacious cabin, Boeing Sky Interior, takes passenger comfort to new heights. Both aircraft include digital avionic systems, enhancing operational capabilities and safety.
Comparing the Different Variants
| Aircraft Variant | Seating Capacity (2-Class/1-Class Max) | Cargo Capacity (m3) | Length (m) | Wing (m) | Height (m) | MTOW (t) | Fuel Capacity (L) | Engine | Speed (Mach) | Range (km) | Ceiling (m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Airbus A319neo | 140/160 | 27 | 33.84 | 35.80 | 11.76 | 75.5 | 29,659 | LEAP-1A or PW1100G | 0.78/0.82 | 6,950 | 11,900-12,100 |
| Airbus A320neo | 165/195 | 37 | 37.57 | 35.80 | 11.76 | 79 | 32,853 | LEAP-1A or PW1100G | 0.78/0.82 | 6,500 | 11,900-12,100 |
| Airbus A321neo | 206/244 | 51 | 44.51 | 35.80 | 11.76 | 97 | 32,853 | LEAP-1A or PW1100G | 0.78/0.82 | 7,400 | 11,900-12,100 |
| 737 MAX 7 | 153/172 | 32.3 | 35.56 | 35.92 | 12.29 | 80 | 25,800 | LEAP-1B | 0.79 | 7,130 | 12,000 |
| 737 MAX 8 | 178/210 | 44 | 39.47 | 35.92 | 12.29 | 82.6 | 25,800 | LEAP-1B | 0.79 | 6,570 | 12,000 |
| 737 MAX 9 | 193/220 | 51.3 | 42.16 | 35.92 | 12.29 | 88.3 | 25,800 | LEAP-1B | 0.79 | 6,570 | 12,000 |
| 737 MAX 10 | 204/230 | 55.5 | 43.79 | 35.92 | 12.29 | 89.8 | 25,800 | LEAP-1B | 0.79 | 6,100 | 12,000 |
Efficiency and Economy
The A320neo and 737 MAX set standards in operational efficiency. The A320neo boasts fuel savings of up to 20%, resulting from its enhanced aerodynamics and engines. Equally, the 737 MAX, with its new engines and aerodynamics, offers fuel efficiency up to 14%, lowering operational costs.
Safety Records
Safety remains a top priority for both Airbus and Boeing. The A320neo holds a strong safety record, with robust systems to ensure the wellbeing of passengers. However, the 737 MAX faced a turbulent journey, with two fatal crashes leading to a global grounding. Since then, Boeing has made extensive modifications to improve the 737 MAX’s safety systems, and it has been cleared by various aviation authorities to return to service.
The Verdict
Taking a comprehensive view, one might notice that each aircraft may surpass the other in varying aspects. For instance, the A321neo boasts a higher passenger capacity than the Boeing 737 MAX 10 in a single-class configuration. Conversely, the 737 MAX 10 outstrips the A321neo in terms of cargo capacity. The A320neo family signifies an advancement over the A320, a creation of the 1980s, while the original 737, the foundation of the 737 MAX, traces its origins back to the 1960s. Because of its low-ground stance, the 737 MAX’s capacity for larger engines than its current CFM LEAP 1B may already be constrained, unlike the A320neo that enjoys a higher ground clearance.
The Boeing 737, on the other hand, has a rich history of dependable service as Boeing’s flagship single-aisle airliner and continues to undergo enhancements. The A320neo, especially its A321neo variant, outshines the 737 MAX in range capabilities.
Determining the superior aircraft between the Airbus A320neo and the Boeing 737 MAX is contingent upon the specific needs and requirements of the airline operating them. In the context of the Philippines, the A320 is favored by most major airlines including Philippine Airlines, PAL Express, Cebu Pacific, AirAsia, and Royal Air. The Boeing 737, on the other hand, is solely operated by SEAir for its cargo services, particularly a single classic 737-200C.
Looking internationally, airlines such as Ryanair, Southwest, and FlyDubai opt for the Boeing 737 MAX. The decision truly hinges on which aircraft best aligns with an airline’s operational needs and specifications. The aircraft that meets these requirements most effectively is the victor.
Nonetheless, as of October 2019, the A320 family managed to eclipse the Boeing 737 in terms of total orders, making it the best-selling airliner. The month ended with 15,193 and 15,136 orders for the A320 and 737 respectively.
By July 2021, Airbus, including the A220, dominated the single-aisle backlog with a 65% share, leaving Boeing trailing with a 35% share.
First love never dies. I fell in love with airplanes and aviation when I was a kid. My dream was to become a pilot, but destiny led me to another path: to be an aviation digital media content creator and a small business owner. My passion for aviation inspires me to bring you quality content through my website and social accounts. Aviation is indeed in my blood and blog!
